CESAR Events Diary

Submit Usage
Document Provider:
Miranda Mugford
Developer:
Miranda Mugford
Contact Details:
Health Economics Group
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
University of East Anglia
Norwich NR4 7TJ
Copyright:
Miranda Mugford on behalf of the HTA programme (Crown Copyright reserved)
Country of Origin:
United Kingdom

Study Completed:
Yes
Year:
2001

DIRUM ID:
32
DIRUM Listing:
15/06/2011

Disease Categories

Lungs & airways

Populations - Age

Age Range: 18 - 65

Populations - Sex

Administration Methods

In person

Instrument Types

Diary

Person(s) Completing Instrument

Patient
Parent/carer

Settings of Care

Specialist tertiary centres

Nature of Intervention

Surgery
Device
Management of care

Items of Resource Being Measured

GP
Inpatient
Community nurse
Practice nurse
Outpatient
Medication
A&E
Employer
Day hospital
Social services
Patient incurred
Physiotherapy
Occupational therapy
Psychologist
Residential care
Healthcare aids
NHS direct
Other non-NHS - Counselling

Other Characterisation Details

Frequency Of Economic Data Collection - Collected by diary
Maximum Recall Period - < 1 week

Primary References

Peek G, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, et al., Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. , The Lancet, 2009, 374, 1352-63.

DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61069-2

Information on how items for costing were identified

Evidence of face, content and criterion validity, for example validation performed to external databases, resource use identified through pilot study and consultation with healthcare professionals.


Piloting of questionnaires for patient / carer completion

Evidence of face, content and criterion validity, for example validation performed to external databases, resource use identified through pilot study and consultation with healthcare professionals.

eek G J, Elbourne D, Mugford M, et al, Randomised controlled trial and parallel economic evaluation of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR), 2010,


Validation

Evidence of face, content and criterion validity, for example validation performed to external databases, resource use identified through pilot study and consultation with healthcare professionals.

eek G J, Elbourne D, Mugford M, et al, Randomised controlled trial and parallel economic evaluation of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR), 2010,


Instrument Resource


Conditions of Use

  • Free access
  • Other - Acknowlege crown copyright

Supporting Materials

  • User manual

The site uses cookies, some may have been set already. Please refer to our privacy policy & cookie usage statement.
If you continue to use the site we'll assume you're happy to accept the cookies.