HOPEFUL Study Patient Questionnaire

Submit Usage
Document Provider:
Klim Mcpherson
Developer:
Klim McPherson
Contact Details:
Klim McPherson Phd FFPH FMedSci
Visiting Professor of Public Health Epidemiology
Nuffield Dept Obs & Gynae & New College
University of Oxford
Copyright:
None
Country of Origin:
United Kingdom

Study Completed:
Yes
Year:
2003

DIRUM ID:
34
DIRUM Listing:
17/06/2011

Disease Categories

Gynaecology

Populations - Age

Age Range: 25 - 85

Populations - Sex

Administration Methods

Via telephone

Instrument Types

Recall questionnaire

Person(s) Completing Instrument

Patient

Settings of Care

Community
Outpatient

Nature of Intervention

Surgery
Imaging

Items of Resource Being Measured

Inpatient
Medication
Day hospital

Other Characterisation Details

Frequency Of Economic Data Collection - Variable
Maximum Recall Period - 12+ months

Primary References

Journal article: Hirst A, Dutton S, Wu O, et al., A multi-centre retrospective cohort study comparing the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of hysterectomy and uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. The HOPEFUL study, Health Technology Assessment, 2008, 12, 1-227

Information on how items for costing were identified

Evidence of content and criterion validity: for example Extensive expert review of previous literature and use of access database to cross-validate dates of admission for length of stays.

Journal article: Hirst A, Dutton S, Wu O, et al., A multi-centre retrospective cohort study comparing the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of hysterectomy and uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. The HOPEFUL study, Health Technology Assessment, 2008, 12, 1-227

Journal article: Edwards R D, Moss J G, Lumsden M A, et al, Uterine-artery embolization versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids, New England Journal of Medicine, 2007, 353, 360–70.


Piloting of questionnaires for patient / carer completion

Evidence of content and criterion validity: for example Extensive expert review of previous literature and use of access database to cross-validate dates of admission for length of stays.

Journal article: Hirst A, Dutton S, Wu O, et al., A multi-centre retrospective cohort study comparing the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of hysterectomy and uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. The HOPEFUL study, Health Technology Assessment, 2008, 12, 1-227


Validation

Evidence of content and criterion validity: for example Extensive expert review of previous literature and use of access database to cross-validate dates of admission for length of stays.

Journal article: Hirst A, Dutton S, Wu O, et al., A multi-centre retrospective cohort study comparing the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of hysterectomy and uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. The HOPEFUL study, Health Technology Assessment, 2008, 12, 1-227


Instrument Resource


Conditions of Use

  • Free access
  • Other - This work was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme (project number 03/60/01) and was published in full in Health Technology Assessment 2008; Vol. 12, No. 5. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the HTA programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

The site uses cookies, some may have been set already. Please refer to our privacy policy & cookie usage statement.
If you continue to use the site we'll assume you're happy to accept the cookies.