Information on how items for costing were identified
Evidence of face, content and criterion validity. Face and content: use of the widely-adapted client service receipt inventory. REF: Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing Psychiatric Interventions. 1999; Discussion Paper 1536: 22. Criterion validity REF: Patel A, Rendu A, Moran S, et al. A comparison of two methods of collecting economic data in primary care. Family Practice 2005;22:323-7.
146Beecham J, Knapp M. , Costing Psychiatric Interventions., Discussion Paper , 1999, 1536,
Piloting of questionnaires for patient / carer completion
Evidence of face, content and criterion validity. Face and content: use of the widely-adapted client service receipt inventory. REF: Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing Psychiatric Interventions. 1999; Discussion Paper 1536: 22. Criterion validity REF: Patel A, Rendu A, Moran S, et al. A comparison of two methods of collecting economic data in primary care. Family Practice 2005;22:323-7.
146Beecham J, Knapp M. , Costing Psychiatric Interventions., Discussion Paper , 1999, 1536,
Validation
Evidence of face, content and criterion validity. Face and content: use of the widely-adapted client service receipt inventory. REF: Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing Psychiatric Interventions. 1999; Discussion Paper 1536: 22. Criterion validity REF: Patel A, Rendu A, Moran S, et al. A comparison of two methods of collecting economic data in primary care. Family Practice 2005;22:323-7.
147Patel A, Rendu A, Moran S, et al., A comparison of two methods of collecting economic data in primary care. , Family Practice, 2005, 22, 323-7
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmi027
Acceptability
100% rate of completion quoted in some studies using CSRIs
Adaptations
Costs due to special schools, foster caring and residential placements included. Medications and criminal justice content excluded. Variation in period of recall - some use 6 months and others use 12 months
